Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Williams v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2020cv00099
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Chris Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Hardeman County et al
as 1:2018cv01238
Plaintiff:
Mario Jones
Defendant:
Tennessee Hardeman County, Chris Williams and City of Bolivar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Roper et al v. Templeton et al
as 3:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
Fredericka Roper , Kendell Martin and Dalila Robertson
Defendant:
Chrystal Templeton , Chris Williams , Jeff Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hutchins v. Williams et al (RLJ2)
as 3:2016cv00182
Plaintiff:
James J. Hutchins
Defendant:
Chris Williams and Monroe County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Local 109 Pension Fund, Operative Plasterers and Cement Masons et al v. Hahn
as 1:2008cv01729
Plaintiff:
Local 109 Pension Fund, Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons, Local 109 Pension Fund, Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons, Local 109 Pension Fund, Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons and others
Defendant:
Robert L Hahn
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ferrell v. City of Cookeville et al
as 2:2008cv00016
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ferrell, Carlos Ferrell, Carlos Ferrell and others
Defendant:
City of Cookeville, Cookeville Police Department, Jeff Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. ASC Exterior Technologies
as 3:2007cv00472
Plaintiff:
Chris Williams
Defendant:
ASC Exterior Technologies
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Moser v. Monroe County, TN et al
as 3:2007cv00151
Plaintiff:
Vicki Moser
Defendant:
Monroe County, TN, Chris Williams, Chris Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lyons v. Brandly et al
as 4:2003cv01620
Plaintiff:
James D. Lyons
Defendant:
Suzanne Brandly , Enid Blankenship , Dr. Spagna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
