Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Banks v. Stokes et al.
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Banks, III, Chuck Banks and Chuckie Banks
Defendant:
Michael T. Stokes, C. Holycross, D. Deangelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
as 3:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Chucky L Hawkins
Defendant:
Tennessee Bureau of Investigations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Woody v. Kelley et al
as 1:2020cv01252
Defendant:
Ben Burnett, Jimmy Gray, Union City Police Department, Union City, TN and others
Plaintiff:
Cornilios Woody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillip Olmstead v. Fentress County Tennessee, et al
as 19-5447
Defendant / Appellee:
LANCE MAYNARD, Correctional Officer, CHARLES CRAVENS, aka Chucky Cravens, TAMMY KING, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP DAVID OLMSTEAD
Olmstead v. Fentress County, TN et al
as 2:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
Phillip David Olmstead
Defendant:
Fentress County, TN, Tony (l/n/u), Chucky Cravens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Chuckie Unsworth
as 15-4273
Movant:
In re: CHUCKIE THOMAS UNSWORTH
Respondent:
WARDEN, MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Unsworth v. Marion Correctional Institution, Warden
as 3:2015cv01915
Petitioner:
Chuckie Thomas Unsworth
Respondent:
Marion Correctional Institution, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01871
Plaintiff:
Chuckie Louis Walker
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willard v. Mattox et al
as 1:2013cv00044
Plaintiff:
Chucky Eugene Willard
Defendant:
Teresa Mattox and Giles County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 5:2012cv01006
Plaintiff:
Chucky D. Flowers
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
