Cases 1 - 6 of 6
THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK v. SAKTHI AUTOMOTIVE GROUP USA, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv10890
Defendant:
SAKTHI AUTOMOTIVE GROUP USA, INC., SAKTHI REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, INC., SAKTHI AMERICA CORPORATION and others
Interested Party:
AAPICO Hitech PLC, General Motors LLC, Fessler & Bowman, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, The Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and The Travelers Indemnity Company of America
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Bangkok Bank Public Company Limited and Punjab National Bank (International) Limited
Receiver:
Kevin English
Not Classified By Court:
Chase Invest Detroit Fund, LLC, Detroit Investment Fund, L.P., SMS Staffing Solutions, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Ford Motor Company
Claimant:
Marcia Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Kurt Pham v. JP Morgan Securities, LLC, et al
as 21-3690
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KURT PHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
CHASE INVESTMENT SERVICES CORPORATION and JP MORGAN SECURITIES, LLC
Pham v. JP Morgan Securities LLC et al
as 2:2020cv04500
Plaintiff:
Kurt Pham
Defendant:
Chase Investment Services Corporation LLC and JP Morgan Securities LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wayne Wheat v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 14-3911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE L. WHEAT
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, MATTHEW COX, UNKNOWN OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Scott et al v. Chase Investment Services Corp. et al
as 4:2010cv10854
Plaintiff:
Karlene Scott, Kevin Gaffney and Lahser Interspecies Research Foundation
Defendant:
Chase Investment Services Corp. and Michael Dymkowski
Day et al v. Chase Investment Services Corp. et al
as 5:2008cv00516
Defendant:
Chase Investment Services Corp., Chase Investment Services Corp., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
