Cases 1 - 10 of 558
Cheng v. US Express, LLC
as 3:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Cherry Cheng
Defendant:
US Express, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Monica Cherry v. Domino's Pizza LLC
as 24-1332
Plaintiff:
MONICA CHERRY
Defendant:
DOMINO'S PIZZA LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2019
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1996
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Young v. Spartanburg County Detention Center et al.
as 1:2023cv01990
Plaintiff:
Corvin J. Young
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Detention Center, Spartanburg County, SC, Chuck Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Next Level Relief, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Dwan Brooks, Mark Anthony Carter, Dioveon Allen and others
Defendant:
Next Level Relief, LLC, Brandon Cain and Justin Bowie
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1595
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cherry v. May
as 5:2023cv01164
Petitioner:
Elliott J. Cherry
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seither & Cherry Quad Cities, Incorporated v. Oakland Automation, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv11310
Plaintiff:
Seither & Cherry Quad Cities, Incorporated
Defendant:
Oakland Automation, Limited Liability Company, Oakland Industries Blocker Corporation and Oakland Automation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
