Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Colon v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02094
Plaintiff:
Victor J. Colon
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Colon-Soto v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Maria de los Angeles Colon-Soto
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Alvarez Roman v. City of Lorain, Ohio et al.
as 1:2023cv02348
Plaintiff:
Luis Angel Alvarez Roman
Defendant:
City of Lorain, James P. McCann, Lorain County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colon v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02682
Plaintiff:
Daniel Colon
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nichols v. Deangelo et al
as 2:2023cv10570
Plaintiff:
Danny Albert Nichols
Defendant:
Jodi Deangelo, Tipa, Halstings and others
Colon et al v. CHC Payroll Agent, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Carlos Colon and Candace Harris
Defendant:
CHC Payroll Agent, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Horrenstein v. Canton, Charter Township of et al
as 2:2022cv12463
Plaintiff:
Stefani Horrenstein
Defendant:
Charter Township of Canton, Chad Baugh, Craig Wilsher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Colon et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
MADELINE COLON and MARIANO COLON
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Workman v. Village of Woodmere et al
as 1:2021cv02325
Plaintiff:
Joseph Workman
Defendant:
Village of Woodmere, Sheila A Mason, Christopher Colon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
