Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ussery v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2023cv02171
Plaintiff:
Roger Ussery
Defendant:
Shelby County and Columbia County, GA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Columbia County Georgia v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45607
Plaintiff:
Columbia County Georgia
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Columbia County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2017op45118
Plaintiff:
Columbia County
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Columbia County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2017op45068
Plaintiff:
Columbia County
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Texas Eastern Transmission, LP v. 3.2 ACRES PERMANENT EASEMENT, AND 4.2 ACRES TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF LAND IN COLERAIN TOWNSHIP, BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO et al
as 2:2014cv02650
Defendant:
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD, Linda K. Kessler Living Trust, Tri-Star Energy Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Texas Eastern Transmission, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
LWD PRP Group v. Alcan Corp, et al
as 14-5730
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LWD PRP GROUP
Defendant - Appellant:
DUKE ENERGY OHIO INC., improperly captioned as Duke Energy Corporation, ALCAN CORPORATION, captioned as Rio Tinto Alcan and pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION and others
In re: Alcan Corporation, et al
as 14-503
Petitioner:
In re: ALCAN CORPORATION, captioned as Rio Tinto Alcan and pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION, BAKER HUGHES INC. and others
LWD PRP Group v. ACF Industries, LLC et al
as 5:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
LWD PRP Group
Defendant:
ACF Industries, LLC, Accent Strip, Inc, Adena Health System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
