Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Ramon King v. James Corrigan
as 22-1581
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAMON D. KING
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES CORRIGAN, Acting Warden, Chippewa County Correctional Facility
Steven KingIn re: Steven King
as 22-5059
Petitioner:
In re: STEVEN D. KING
Respondent:
MARTIN FRINK, Warden
King v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2021cv00576
Plaintiff:
Steven D. King
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon T. Hininger, David M. Garfinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Bradshaw et al
as 3:2020cv00126
Defendant:
Unamed Loudon County Goverment Employees and Administrators, Corporal Angi Martin, Buddy Bradshaw and others
Plaintiff:
Terry D King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05392
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Larry D. King and Rosalind M. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. King et al
as 0:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
Arlena Gibson Bailey
Defendant:
Randy D. King, R.K. Construction, Inc. and Randy D. King doing business as RK Construction and Roofing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Compound Property Management LLC et al v. Build Realty, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00133
Plaintiff:
R&G Cincy Investments, LLC, R, Compound Property Management LLC and others
Defendant:
Gary Bailey, George Triantafilou, Stephen D. King and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Arrowhead Investments LLC, MHC LLC and DP Black Investments LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00815
Plaintiff:
Paul D King
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Crawford et al v. Bevin et al
as 3:2017cv00485
Plaintiff:
Jamal R. Crawford and Walter D. King
Defendant:
Matt Bevin, Greg Fischer and Mark Bolton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
