Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Darrin LaPine v. D. Moore, et al
as 24-1146
Plaintiff:
DARRIN LAPINE
Defendant:
D. MOORE, Lieutenant, SERGEANT GOULD, STEPHANIE GORDON, Supervisor and others
Moore v. Medical Management International, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Danny D. Moore
Defendant:
Medical Management International, Inc. doing business as Banfield Pet Hospital
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Moore #178814 v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv01220
Plaintiff:
Ladon D. Moore #178814
Defendant:
Unknown Johnson, Unknown Part(y)(ies), Unknown Majerczyk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore #178814 v. Kamardt et al
as 1:2023cv01213
Plaintiff:
Ladon D. Moore #178814
Defendant:
Unknown Kamardt, Unknown Part(y)(ies), N. Brooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore #178814 v. Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1
as 1:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Ladon D. Moore #178814
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore #178814 v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00872
Plaintiff:
Ladon D. Moore #178814
Defendant:
Unknown Johnson, Unknown Erway, Unknown Clouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker #593090 v. Tenhov et al
as 1:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parker #593090
Defendant:
B. Tenhov, D. Moore and Unknown Klingel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Kevin Moore
as 22-3521
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN D. MOORE
LaPine #305535 v. Moore et al
as 2:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Darrin LaPine #305535
Defendant:
D. Moore, Unknown Gould, Stephanie Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Hawkersmith et al
as 3:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Terry D. Moore
Defendant:
Scott "Ike" Hawkersmith and SSE, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
