Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Martin v. Holiday Inn Hotel & Suites, an IHG Hotel et al.
as 3:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Daniel Martin
Defendant:
Holiday Inn Hotel & Suites, an IHG Hotel, Intellistay Lima LLC doing business as Holiday Inn Hotel & Suites, Sterling Lodging, LLC doing business as Holiday Inn Hotel & Suites and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Marin
as 1:2022mc51512
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Martin and Daniel Marin
Martin et al v. Children's Group LLC
as 5:2022cv01290
Defendant:
Children's Group, LLC, Hearthsong and John Doe Corporations 1-5
Plaintiff:
Joel S. Martin and Danielle Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Patton v. City of Crittenden et al
as 2:2021cv00014
Defendant:
James Purcell, Joseph Dusing, Jennifer Thurman-Humphrey and others
Plaintiff:
Camilla Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Cain v. The People of the State of MI, et al
as 19-1879
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD SNYDER, DANIEL MARTIN, C. MASKEY and others
Defendant:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK CAIN and DERRICK D. CAIN
Daniel Pirkel v. DeWayne Burton
as 19-1349
Respondent / Appellee:
DEWAYNE BURTON
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL MARTIN PIRKEL
Cain v. The People of the State of Michigan et al
as 2:2019cv10243
Defendant:
The People of the State of Michigan, Kim Worthy, Maskey and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cain
Martin v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2017cv10769
Plaintiff:
Daniel Martin
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Genesee County Jail Correctional Facility, Pickell and others
Martin v. Bigger et al
as 4:2016cv14260
Plaintiff:
Daniel Martin
Defendant:
Scott Bigger and Bigger Law Firm
Martin v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2016cv14080
Plaintiff:
Daniel Martin
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Rick Snyder, Center for Forensic Psychiatry and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
