Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Robert Sango v. Sherry Burt, et al
as 23-2024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DORIAN SANGO
Defendant:
SHERRY L. BURT
Defendant / Appellee:
CAREY BROWN, Lieutenant, JASON BROCK, Correctional Officer and KYLE MAUS, Correctional Officer
Harrison v. Dayton Municipal Court of Ohio et al
as 3:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Todd Harrison
Defendant:
Dayton Municipal Court of Ohio, Christopher Roberts, Christoopher Sturm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
USA v. Dorian McMullen
as 23-3656
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DORIAN DEON MCMULLEN
Gray v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2023cv11965
Plaintiff:
Dorian Gray
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Doing business as BCBSM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dorian Sykes v. County of Genessee, MI, et al
as 23-1351
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DORIAN TREVOR SYKES
Defendant / Appellee:
GENESEE COUNTY, MI
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH CORPORATION
Robert Sango v. Timothy Fleury
as 23-1124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DORIAN SANGO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TIMOTHY FLEURY
McComb v. Best Buy Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Robert S. McComb
Defendant:
Best Buy Inc., Annah Jane Doe, Dorian John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Sango v. Timothy Fleury
as 22-2068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DORIAN SANGO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TIMOTHY FLEURY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
