Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Gainey v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03937
Plaintiff:
Wilson Gainey
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gainey v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02327
Plaintiff:
CARLTON GAINEY
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gainey et al v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00345
Plaintiff:
Annie E Gainey and Harvey N. Gainey
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Gainey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv02436
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Richard D Gainey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425
Robert Johnson v. Seth Abel, et al
as 19-3774
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTINE LI, BRIAN LOUIS MANNION, CHRISTOPHER G. BLACK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Abel et al.
as 2:2019cv02865
Defendant:
Robert Francis O'Connor, John H. Spellman, Arthur Henry Hopwood, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson and Robert W. Johnson, r
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Griffith v. Gainey et al
as 3:2015cv00773
Plaintiff:
Billy Dean Griffith
Defendant:
Kenneth Gainey and J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
General Electric Capital Corpo v. Harvey Gainey, Sr.
as 12-2671
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
HARVEY N. GAINEY, SR., an individual
Harvey Gainey, Sr., et al v. CIR
as 12-2555
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARVEY N. GAINEY, SR. and ANNIE GAINEY
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Harvey Gainey, Sr. v. Barry Lefkowitz, as Liquidatio
as 12-1009
Debtor:
In re: GAINEY CORPORATION, ET AL.
Appellant:
HARVEY N. GAINEY, SR.
Appellee:
BARRY P. LEFKOWITZ, AS LIQUIDATION TRUSTEE OF THE GAINEY COMPANIES LIQUIDATION TRUST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
