Cases 1 - 10 of 2,789
Webb v. First Realty et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
First Realty, Howard Glen McDonald, Robert Grimsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Felix Jones-Hill v. Catherine Bauman
as 24-1444
Petitioner:
FELIX JONES-HILL
Respondent:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Wood-Hill v. Hinkle et al
as 3:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Lavern Wood-Hill
Defendant:
Jack Hinkle and B & C Transport Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Old School Sales, LLC et al v. Cooper et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Old School Sales, LLC doing business as Old School Vapor and Sak Wholesale, LLC
Defendant:
Brent Cooper, Don Brite, Andrew Burdett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2024cv02519
Plaintiff:
Chad Hill
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill, Jr. v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02497
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Town of Chapel Hill, Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc.
Defendant:
Town of Chapel Hill, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Hill v. Haney et al
as 3:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Shaun Hill
Defendant:
William Haney, Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP and Delaware Valley Shippers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
