Cases 1 - 10 of 639
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
May v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Herbert May
Defendant:
Calhoun, County of, Kurtis Cunkle, Sterling Ladd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boeman v. Henry Ford Hospital
as 2:2024cv11169
Plaintiff:
Emily Boeman
Defendant:
Henry Ford Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Loomus v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2024cv11162
Plaintiff:
Rachelle S. Loomus
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, Henry Ford College Foundation and Memberselect Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv10897
Plaintiff:
Gerald E. Andrews, Mary Margaret Baker, John Franklin Bishop and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Williams #243786 v. Baker et al
as 1:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Marcus Henry Williams #243786
Defendant:
Dell Baker, M. Truxell, M. Kirky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nirenberg v. Couzens, Lansky, Fealk, Roeder & Lazar, PC et al
as 2:2024cv10619
Plaintiff:
Henry Nirenberg
Defendant:
COUZENS, LANSKY, FEALK, ROEDER & LAZAR, P.C.,, Jack S Couzens, SADECKI & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Henry v. Parr-Mirza et al
as 2:2024cv10595
Plaintiff:
Arnold V Henry
Defendant:
Parr-Mirza, B. Schaschko, Angela Joseph and others
Owens v. Wineman, III
as 2:2024cv10406
Plaintiff:
David Owens
Defendant:
Henry Wineman, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
