Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rotta-Hite v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00898
Plaintiff:
Dawn Marie Rotta-Hite
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Davis et al v. Hite et al
as 2:2015cv10161
Plaintiff:
Anita Ann Davis and Jacquelin Ann Hicks
Defendant:
Douglas Hite , Robert Farmer , Mike Wolosuk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler et al v. Genesee County Department of Community Mental Health et al
as 2:2012cv13151
Plaintiff:
Gemale Tyler , General Tyler , Napolean Tyler and others
Defendant:
Mount Morris, Township of , Officer John Doe I, Officer John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #229916 v. Yoke
as 2:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Hite Yoke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamerson #138940 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2008cv00284
Plaintiff:
David L. Jamerson #138940
Defendant:
Patricia L. Caruso, David Bergh, Lloyd Rapelje and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brandon #269552 v. Bergh et al
as 2:2008cv00152
Plaintiff:
Isreal Jabron Brandon #269552
Defendant:
David Bergh, Wayne DeShambo, Ronald Bobo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Conner #269170 v. Hite et al
as 2:2008cv00149
Plaintiff:
Delvin Conner #269170
Defendant:
Unknown Hite, Ruby Cheatham, Charles Simons and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carson #193689 v. Monroe et al
as 2:2007cv00029
Plaintiff:
Antonio F. Carson #193689
Defendant:
Sandra Monroe, Richard Miller, Mary K. Hite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richmond #195922 v. Hite et al
as 2:2007cv00003
Plaintiff:
Deon Richmond #195922
Defendant:
Mary K. Hite, David Bergh, R. Salmi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
