Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Horsley v. USA
as 1:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
William Radley Horsley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Horsley et al v. Bon Secours Mercy Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
Christa Horsley, Sherry O'Neal and Albert Shifflett, Jr.
Defendant:
Bon Secours Mercy Health, Inc. and Perry Johnson & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
James Sullivan v. Savon Kelsey, et al
as 22-3420
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SAVON KELSEY, MORGAN ST. JOHN, JOHN VOGT and others
USA v. Horsley et al
as 3:2021cv00050
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Julia Horsley and Premier Bookkeeping Group
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Larry Jones v. Mark Horsley, et al
as 21-2950
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY DARNELL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MARK HORSLEY, individual capacity jointly and severally and SERGEANT DANIEL PORTER, individual capacity jointly and severally
Larry Jones v. Mark Horsley, et al
as 21-2888
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY DARNELL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MARK HORSLEY, individual capacity jointly and severally and SERGEANT DANIEL PORTER, individual capacity jointly and severally
Sullivan v. Kelsey et al
as 1:2021cv00421
Defendant:
William Horsley, David Mingo, Nicolas Ivanovic and others
Plaintiff:
James Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00679
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horsley v. Nice et al
as 1:2020cv00534
Defendant:
Allen Nice and thomas recck
Plaintiff:
Steven Horsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
