Cases 1 - 10 of 13
USA v. Donte Prince
as 22-4039
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DONTE J. PRINCE
Evans v. United States et al
as 2:2019cv02487
Plaintiff:
Dennis J. Evans
Defendant:
United States, A. M. Owens, Health Services Unit - FCI -Memphis Medium and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edmondson v. Prince et al
as 3:2017cv00783
Plaintiff:
Mikelyn Edmondson
Defendant:
Billy J. Prince, Jr. and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Prince v. Chong Cha, et al
as 15-3816
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES J. PRINCE
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. CHONG SUN CHA, Individually & Official Capacities, DR. DANIEL KEATON, Individually & Official Capacities, SUZY SHORTT-TUCKER, L.N.P. and others
James Prince v. Brian Cook
as 14-4038
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES J. PRINCE
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN COOK, Warden
Prince v. Procter & Gamble Company et al
as 1:2013cv00902
Plaintiff:
Mark J Prince
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company, Procter & Gamble Intergrated Organization Design Voluntary Separation Plan The Procter & Gamble Company and Procter & Gamble Health & Welfare Committee The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
James Prince v. Cha, et al
as 13-3936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES J. PRINCE
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. CHA, Individually & Official Capacities, DR. KEATON, Individually & Official Capacities and L.N.P. SHORTUCKER
Prince v. Cha et al
as 2:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
James J Prince
Defendant:
Cha, Keaton, North Central Correctional and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prince v. Commissioner of SSA
as 2:2010cv00008
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Prince
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00093
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
