Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Motes v. Circle K Stores Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01656
Plaintiff:
Joseph Motes, as Administrator of the Estate of Gloria J. Wells and Joseph E. Motes
Defendant:
SCF RC Funding IV LLC, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc., Mac's Convenience Stores LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boyd Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC et al v. Wells
as 0:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Boyd Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC and Boyd Nursing and Rehabilitation Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Leonard J. Wells
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Gregor et al v. Rice Drilling D LLC et al
as 2:2021cv03999
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Gregor, Ashley N Gregor, BRK Energy LLC and others
Defendant:
Rice Drilling D LLC, EQT Production Company, EQT Energy LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Bard Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03712
Defendant:
Davol Inc, Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard
Plaintiff:
Malinda J Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Wade et al
as 1:2014cv01637
Plaintiff:
Bernard J. Wells, Jr.
Defendant:
Edward Wade, Francine Goldberg , Lisa R. Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gary Lentz v. Bettina Wells, et al
as 14-1324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY LENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BETTINA J. WELLS, SHANE JACKSON, DARRELL STEWARD and others
Wells v. USA
as 1:2012cv02027
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael J. Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Peabody Coal Co. v. Shirley Wells, et al
as 12-3859
Petitioner:
PEABODY COAL CO.
Respondent:
SHIRLEY WELLS, Widow of Ronald J. Wells and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES
Lentz v. Loxton et al
as 5:2012cv12037
Plaintiff:
Gary Lentz
Defendant:
John Loxton, Gregory, Weberg and others
Lentz v. Laxton et al
as 2:2012cv11524
Plaintiff:
Gary Lentz
Defendant:
John Laxton, John Gregory, John Weberg and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
