Cases 1 - 10 of 664
Poole v. Henry County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv01258
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Henry County, Tennessee and Stephanie Hale
Plaintiff:
Shaun Poole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv13129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00598
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Loveless Cafe, LLC v. Katie Kime, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01199
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Katie Kime, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Loveless Cafe, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Beauford v. Riems et al
as 2:2024cv02695
Plaintiff:
Brandon A Beauford
Defendant:
Jeffrey Riems, John Does 1-10 and EAN Holdings, LLC d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Saulsberry et al v. The National General Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv02681
Defendant:
The National General Insurance Company, XYZ UNKNOWN CORPORATIONS AND JOHN DOES 1-10 and Integon Indemnity Corporation
Plaintiff:
George Saulsberry, Jr. and George Saulsberry
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03910
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Michael Hester v. Chester County, TN, et al
as 24-5800
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, BLAIR WEAVER, BRIAN STOUT and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HESTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
