Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Fanester James v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-1053
Defendant / Appellee:
JUAN DAVIS, CITY OF DETROIT, MI, SAMUEL PIONESSA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FANESTER JAMES
Fanester James v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 20-1805
Defendant / Appellee:
JUAN DAVIS, CITY OF DETROIT, MI, SAMUEL PIONESSA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FANESTER JAMES
Phillips v. Columbus Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv01120
Defendant:
Michael Hughes, Officer Ty Stoneking, Judge Richard Frye and others
Plaintiff:
Earnest L Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. City of Detroit et al
as 4:2017cv10506
Plaintiff:
Fanester James
Defendant:
City of Detroit, James Craig, Samuel Pionessa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tinkler et al v. MillCreek Metropolitan Park District et al
as 4:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Patricia Tinkler , Peter Mitchell Lynch and Friends and Families, Ltd.
Defendant:
MillCreek Metropolitan Park District , Aaron Young , Board of Park Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Clark v. Insituform Technologies, LLC
as 1:2016cv00803
Plaintiff:
Jason Clark
Defendant:
Insituform Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Clark, DVM v. BluePearl Kentucky, LLC
as 3:2014cv00259
Plaintiff:
Jason Clark, DVM
Defendant:
BluePearl Kentucky, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cloke v. Crane, et al
as 1:2013cv00699
Plaintiff:
Alfred K Cloke, III
Defendant:
Don Crane, Bob Elliott, Todd Ruswinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Alfred Cloke, III v. Bobby Yeggy, et al
as 13-3521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED K. CLOKE, III
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY YEGGY, DOUGLAS MCCARON, UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA and others
Cloke v. Elliott et al
as 1:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
Alfred K. Cloke, III
Defendant:
Bob Elliott, Douglas McCarron, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
