Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ayers v. City of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv02383
Defendant:
Cerelyn 'C.J.' Davis, John Doe I, Sergeant Miller (John Doe II) and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ayers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Geneva, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45214
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical Companies Inc., Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
City of Geneva, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Steve Odom v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 15-2254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON, INC., JEFFREY C. STIEVE, MD, WILLIAM BORGERDING, MD and others
Markowitz v. The University of Memphis et al
as 2:2014cv02806
Plaintiff:
Paul Markowitz
Defendant:
The University of Memphis, John & Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10 & Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Fuller v. John Gamelin, et al
as 13-1967
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS FULLER, aka Raleem-X
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN J. GAMELIN, Correctional Officer, KEVIN M. ALEXANDER, Correctional Officer, GREG E. WINK, Correctional Officer and others
Curtis Fuller v. John Gamelin, et al
as 12-1694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS FULLER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN J. GAMELIN, Correctional Officer, KEVIN M. ALEXANDER, Correctional Officer, GREG E. WINK, Correctional Officer and others
David Aslani v. Sparrow Health System, et al
as 11-1178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID D. ASLANI
Defendant - Appellee:
SPARROW HEALTH SYSTEM, KEN HANKAMD, individually and as security officer of Sparrow Health System, DENNIS SWAN, individually and as administrator-in-charge of Sparrow Health System and others
Curtis Fuller v. John Gamelin
as 09-1413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS FULLER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN J. GAMELIN, Correctional Officer, KEVIN M. ALEXANDER, Correctional Officer, GREG E. WINK, Correctional Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
