Cases 1 - 10 of 1,050
Haynie v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Haynie
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Easterling v. Mistry et al
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kevin Easterling
Defendant:
United States of America and Savita Mistry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Goodwin v. City of Bristol, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Defendant:
Eric Keller, Scott Shaffer, John Kistner and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ouellet v. Whitaker et al
as 3:2024cv00903
Defendant:
Ty Daul, Lori Sundberg, Peter Wilver and others
Interested Party:
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ouellet
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Lawrence v. Vantell
as 3:2024cv00897
Petitioner:
Kevin Lawrence
Respondent:
Vince Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kuchenmeister v. Lovell
as 3:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Larry Kuchenmeister
Defendant:
Kevin Lovell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johansen v. Drinkard et al
as 1:2024cv01149
Defendant:
Darby Addison Drinkard, Ashley Hollingsworth, Kevin Ralph and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Johansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02500
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pratt et al v. South Central Recovery, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02484
Plaintiff:
Marlesia Pratt and Kevin Pratt
Defendant:
Aaron Scott Smith, South Central Recovery, LLC, Mickie Winn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
