Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gorbey v. Doe et al
as 6:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey, Tsunami Khan and Chief Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe, Mr. Stoval, Tony Shult and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bolog et al. v. El-Gharib et al.
as 5:2024cv00952
Plaintiff:
Frank B. Bolog and U.S. Coach Sales & Leasing, Ltd.
Defendant:
Wissam Zaki El-Gharib, Adnan Mahmood, Shahid Latif and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
USA v. Sardar Ashrafkhan
as 24-1452
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SARDAR ASHRAFKHAN, aka Sardar Khan, (Dr. Khan)
Khan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01271
Plaintiff:
Amy Khan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Stardust Memorials, LLC v. GetUrns, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01327
Plaintiff:
Stardust Memorials, LLC
Defendant:
GetUrns, LLC, Cameron Allahverdi and Hamza Khan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Sardar Ashrafkhan v. USA
as 24-1019
Petitioner:
SARDAR ASHRAFKHAN, aka Sardar Khan, (Dr. Khan)
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GS Holistic, LLC v. Smoke Heaven LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03788
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Smoke Heaven LLC and Mian Shahzaib Khan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
