Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5307
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stovall v. Marc Jones Construction, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2022cv02137
Plaintiff:
Joseph E Stovall
Defendant:
Marc Jones Construction, L.L.C. and Michael Kilpatrick
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Darrell Carter v. Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick, et al
as 21-6206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL FRANK CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHISHOLM CHISHOLM & KILPATRICK, UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and others
Kilpatrick et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05524
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Kilpatrick and Kitty Tash
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. Chisholm, Chisholm & Kilpatrick et al (TV1)
as 2:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Darrell Frank Carter
Defendant:
Chisholm, Chisholm & Kilpatrick, USAA, Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laura Scott v. Nandan Patel, et al
as 20-1773
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC SABREE, Wayne County Treasurer, CYNTHIA M. YUN, KATHLEEN ANGERER, City Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAURA MARIE SCOTT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kilpatrick v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01615
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Kilpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Wooten et al
as 2:2020cv00357
Defendant:
Gary Sneed, Lisa Cooke, David Dobbins and others
Plaintiff:
David Avery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
