Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mullins v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05850
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas L Mullins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Mullins et al
as 5:2019cv00325
Defendant:
James E. Mullins, Brandi L. Mullins, United States of America, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Reid v. Select Wine Distributors, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv11027
Plaintiff:
Tom Reid
Defendant:
Select Wine Distributors, LLC and Edward L. Mullin
USA v. Mullins et al
as 5:2016cv00042
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Thomas L. Mullins and Amanda Lynn Mullins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Mullins et al v. U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
Jefferson L. Mullins and William E. Hines
Defendant:
U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mullins et al v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2015cv00106
Plaintiff:
James R Mullins and Kathleen L Mullins
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Mullins v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01027
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Mullins
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leona Mullins v. Oscar Cyranek, et al
as 14-3817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONA MULLINS, Individually and as the administrator of, on behalf of, Davon L. Mullins.
Defendant - Appellee:
OSCAR CYRANEK, City of Cincinnati Police Officer, Individually, JOHN DOE, City of Cincinnati Police Officer, Individually and JANE DOE, City of Cincinnati Police Officer, Individually
Mullins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2011cv00407
Plaintiff:
Teresa L Mullins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mullins v. City of Jackson et al
as 5:2008cv00286
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Mullins
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Jackson Police Dept, John Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
