Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Jeffrey Price v. USA, et al
as 23-1743
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY L. PRICE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Edwards et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 5:2023cv01052
Plaintiff:
Carl W. Edwards, Kevin L. Price and Donny Sanders
Defendant:
Iran and Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Price v. City of Port Clinton, et al.
as 3:2022cv02338
Plaintiff:
Darryl L. Price
Defendant:
City of Port Clinton, Officer Nick Davenport, Officer John Suppelsa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2022cv02200
Petitioner:
Joshua L. Price
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Kendall et al
as 3:2022cv10739
Plaintiff:
Curwood L. Price
Defendant:
Sean Kendall and Elizabeth Hertel
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Price v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv10662
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Price
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Price v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00820
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price v. Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency
as 2:2020cv12756
Plaintiff:
Curwood L. Price
Defendant:
Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency
Price et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04678
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David L. Price and Sarah Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price #220572 v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 1:2016cv01134
Plaintiff:
Curwood L. Price #220572
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
