Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Chavez v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02582
Plaintiff:
Alberto Lara Chavez
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Debose v. DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2024cv01111
Plaintiff:
Rashad Debose
Defendant:
DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC.
Petitioner:
City of Columbus and Lara Baker-Morrish
Debose v. DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC.,
as 2:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Rashad Debose
Defendant:
DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC., and Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc.
Petitioner:
City of Columbus and Lara Baker-Morrish
Harris v. Michigan Department of Civil Rights et al
as 2:2023cv13082
Plaintiff:
John Isaac Harris
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Civil Rights, Lori Vinson, Cari Cooper and others
Right to Life of Michigan et al v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Right to Life of Michigan, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Gina Johnsen and others
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel and Jocelyn Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Morgrette et al v. Sisson
as 2:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Lara Morgrette
Defendant:
Mark Sisson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jaime Lara v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03575
Plaintiff:
Victoria Jaime Lara
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
