Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jeffrey Prater v. James Linderman, et al
as 19-2485
Defendant / Appellee:
IRENE DAVIS, Sheriff Deputy, in her official and individual capacities, JENNIFER KRUSSELL, Sheriff Deputy, JAMES R. LINDERMAN, Emmet County Prosecuting Attorney in his official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY BERNARD PRATER
McNamara v. PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SERVICES, INC., a foreign nonprofit corporation
as 5:2019cv11513
Plaintiff:
Michael McNamara
Defendant:
PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SERVICES, INC., a foreign nonprofit corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prater v. Linderman et al
as 1:2018cv00992
Defendant:
James R. Linderman, Michael McNamara, Cody Wheat and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bernard Prater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wayne Hart v. 90th Judicial District Court, et al
as 15-1938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE THOMAS HART
Defendant - Appellee:
90TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, named as State of Michigan, 90th Judicial District Court for the Couny of Emmet, JAMES N. ERHART, Judge, LARRY L. BURGESS, Magistrate and others
Hart v. 90th Judicial District Court et al
as 1:2015cv00606
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Hart
Defendant:
90th Judicial District Court, James N. Erhart, Larry L. Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darwich v. Dearborn, City of et al
as 2:2013cv10254
Plaintiff:
Ali Darwich
Defendant:
Dearborn, City of, Kevin Schaumburger, Glenn Carriveau and others
Hamad v. Dearborn, City of et al
as 2:2011cv12982
Plaintiff:
Assad Hamad
Defendant:
Dearborn, City of , Kevin Schaumburger , Glenn Carriveau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Acker et al v. Doeren Mayhew and Company Professional Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv11261
Plaintiff:
John Acker, Kari Acker, Henry Abrams and others
Defendant:
Doeren Mayhew and Company Professional Corporation, Doeren Mayhew and Company Professional Corporation, Todd R Fox and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
