Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Earley et al v. Oakwood Healthcare, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv12475
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Earley, as Personal Representative, Estate of Stephen Robert Kowalewski, Kimberly Earley and others
Defendant:
Oakwood Healthcare, Inc. d/b/a Beaumont Hospital-Taylor, Beaumont Hospital, Taylor, William Beaumont Hospital d/b/a Beaumont Health System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Kellie Farris v. Oakland County, MI, et al
as 23-1739
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELLIE FARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
OAKLAND COUNTY, MI, DEPUTY MARK BOWERING, DEPUTY ERIN VINCENT and others
AlDulaimi v. Deer et al
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Ahmed AlDulaimi
Defendant:
Lt. Michale Deer and Simpson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Arivett v. Childress et al
as 5:2023cv11335
Plaintiff:
Jesse Allen Arivett
Defendant:
Childress, Wright, Lobiner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
