Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Smith v. Jerome et al
as 4:2023cv11066
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carson Smith
Defendant:
Jerome, STF Mail Room and Brian Barton
Kirkland v. ODRC et al
as 4:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Elliott Kirkland
Defendant:
ODRC, Anette Chambers-Smith, Lt. Prate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Pann v. Sherry Burt, et al
as 22-1744
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT WILLIAM PANN
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERRY L. BURT, Warden, ELISIA HARDIMAN, Librarian, JOHN DOE, Mail Room Supervisor and others
Naguyen v. Floyd et al
as 2:2022cv11350
Plaintiff:
Duc Van Naguyen
Defendant:
Michelle Floyd, Jackson Cooper and Mail Room Supervisor
Solomon v. Rhodes et al
as 3:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Kendall Dejuan Solomon
Defendant:
Dusty Rhodes, (f/n/u) Rule, (f/n/u) Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowles v. Tennessee Department of Correctional - CCA et al
as 3:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Mario Bowles
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correctional - CCA, Warden f/n/u Frink, Assistant Warden J. Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alex Pedrin v. T. Middleton, et al
as 21-6135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEX JOSEPH PEDRIN
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER T. MIDDLETON, USP-McCreary, OFFICER DAULTON, USP-McCreary, WARDEN CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ, USP-McCreary and others
Raymond Kyle v. Gregory Skipper, et al
as 21-1632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND LEE KYLE
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY SKIPPER, Warden, JOHN ROBENAULT, Chaplain, MICHAEL SUN, Prisoner Counselor and others
Trent Young v. MDOC, et al
as 21-2889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRENT YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Employer, JASMINA MASSEY, Prisoner Counselor, KIRT MAHAR, Mail Room Staff and others
Beal #327749 v. Davids et al
as 1:2021cv00522
Defendant:
ICF Mail Room, John Davids, Phyllis Clement and others
Plaintiff:
Latavious Beal #327749
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
