Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Cain v. Higginbotham, et al
as 2:2023cv02449
Defendant:
Michael Todd Higginbotham also known as Higginbotham Dental Group, PLLC doing business as Higginbotham Family Dental, Higginbotham Dental Group, PLLC and Higginbotham Dental Group, PLLC doing business as Higginbotham Family Dental
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Gay Abadie Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Michael Hilton v. Daniel Akers
as 23-5567
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL TODD HILTON
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL AKERS, Warden, Lee Adjustment Center
Hilton v. Akers
as 3:2020cv00769
Respondent:
Daniel Akers
Petitioner:
Michael Todd Hilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hilton v. Akers
as 5:2020cv00428
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Akers
Petitioner:
Michael Todd Hilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitlock v. Men's Addiction Recovery Campus et al
as 1:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Harrison P. Whitlock
Defendant:
Men's Addiction Recovery Campus and Michael Todd Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Ingram Barge Company et al
as 5:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Martin
Defendant:
Ingram Barge Company and Inland Marine Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
USA v. Lilly et al
as 3:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Stacy L. Lilly, Michael Todd Brown and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Nutter v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00513
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Nutter
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Lilly et al
as 3:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Stacy L. Lilly, Michael Todd Brown and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
