Cases 1 - 10 of 324
Moses v. Central State University et al
as 2:2024cv03130
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Moses, III
Defendant:
Central State University, Central State University Board of Trustees, Alex Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moses v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01983
Plaintiff:
Eli Moses
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simmons v. Genesee, County of et al
as 4:2024cv10815
Defendant:
YesCare Corp, CHS TX, Inc, Genesee, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Kristen Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01056
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Pamela Moses v. TN, et al
as 24-5195
Plaintiff:
PAMELA J. MOSES
Defendant:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, STEVEN JOHN MULROY, in his individual and official capacity as the District Attorney General and AMY P. WEIRICH, in her individual capacity
White v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10550
Plaintiff:
Mark White
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, MDOC, Smith and others
Moses et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Gregory Moses and Denise Moses
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pamela Moses v. TN, et al
as 24-5086
Plaintiff:
PAMELA J. MOSES
Defendant:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, AMY P. WEIRICH, in her individual capacity and STEVEN JOHN MULROY
Moses v. City of Memphis
as 2:2023cv02627
Plaintiff:
Pamela Moses
Defendant:
City of Memphis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Thomas v. McConahay
as 1:2023cv01892
Petitioner:
Moses Thomas
Respondent:
Warden Timothy McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
