Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Latausha Simmons v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 23-1724
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATAUSHA SIMMONS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, MI, SOUTHFIELD, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE CHIEF JOSEPH E. THOMAS, JR. and others
England et al v. Denso International America, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv11129
Plaintiff:
Martha D England, Dustin M Martin and Josephine P Thomas
Defendant:
Denso International America, Inc., Board of Directors of DENSO International America, Inc., Seiji Maeda and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Latausha Simmons v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 21-1134
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, SOUTHFIELD, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, [UNKNOWN] CURRY, Detroit Police CAT Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATAUSHA SIMMONS
Simmons v. Southfield, City of et al
as 5:2019cv11726
Defendant:
Southfield, City of, James Craig, Southfield Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Latausha Simmons
Robert Thomas v. Lori Briggs, et al
as 19-1194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT P. THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
LORI A. BRIGGS and MELISSA BORDEN, dba The Devoted Barn
State of Ohio v. Thomas
as 5:2017cv01898
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio
Defendant:
Joseph P. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America v. Thomas
as 3:2017cv00020
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
John P Thomas
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
v. Thomas et al
as 4:2015cv10210
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Thomas
Defendant:
Lori A. Briggs and Melissa Borden
In re: Millard Thomas III
as 13-8052
Debtor:
In re: MILLARD P. THOMAS, III
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAUREN A. HELBLING
Defendant - Appellee:
MILLARD P. THOMAS, III, MILLARD P. THOMAS, JR., PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Snider v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 3:2010cv00032
Plaintiff:
Karen Snider
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Brad Henry, Jane Doe Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
