Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lott v. Pacer, et al.,
as 2:2013cv01181
Plaintiff:
Harry William Lott
Defendant:
Pacer, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00084
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
In re: Pacer Managment
as 13-8016
Debtor:
In re: PACER MANAGEMENT OF KENTUCKY, LLC
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KNOX COUNTY, KENTUCKY and KNOX HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Knox County Hospital
Defendant - Appellant:
PACER MANAGEMENT OF KENTUCKY, LLC, PACER HEALTH MANAGEMENT CORPORATION OF KENTUCKY and CUMBERLAND-PACER, LLC
Koffron et al v. Bregu et al
as 2:2013cv11363
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Koffron and Paulette Koffron
Defendant:
Alket Bregu , Pacer Cartage, Inc. and Pacer International, Inc.
Pacer Health Corporation et al v. Anand et al
as 5:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
Pacer Health Corporation , Rainier Gonzalez and John Chi
Defendant:
Ashwini Anand and Satyabrata Chatterjee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
National Bankers Trust Corporation v. Peak Logistics LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02268
Plaintiff:
National Bankers Trust Corporation
Defendant:
Peak Logistics LLC , Summitt Trucking LLC , Pacer Transportation Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pacer Health Corporation v. Cumberland-Pacer, LLC et al
as 5:2010cv00355
Plaintiff:
Pacer Health Corporation
Defendant:
Cumberland-Pacer, LLC, Ashwini Anand and Satyabrata Chatterjee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saint Joseph's At East Georgia, Inc. v. Pacer Health Corporation
as 5:2009fj00004
Plaintiff:
Saint Joseph's At East Georgia, Inc.
Defendant:
Pacer Health Corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
