Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Lee v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Herbert Eugene Lee, III
Defendant:
Richard Williams, Joshua Pickering, Nicholas Hollkamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
iKeyless, LLC v. Picker
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
iKeyless, LLC doing business as Car Keys Express
Defendant:
Nathan Picker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal
Caddell et al v. Obion County Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv01011
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Caddell, Deandre" Pickering, Gary Baker and others
Defendant:
Obion County Detention Center, Carl Jackson, Kent Treece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dixie Pickers, LLC v. Moseley et al
as 2:2018cv02057
Plaintiff:
Dixie Pickers, LLC
Defendant:
JP Moseley and Dixie Pickers of Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Hegedeos v. Brosky et al
as 1:2017cv00960
Defendant:
Curt Brosky, Linda Sack, Barbara Stepanek and others
Plaintiff:
Christina M. Hegedeos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pickering et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00160
Plaintiff:
Janis Pickering and Reginald Pickering
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pickering v. Levy & Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Donette Pickering
Defendant:
Levy & Associates, LLC and Atlantic Credit & Finance Special Finance Unit, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pickering v. Levy & Associates, LLC
as 1:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
Donette Pickering
Defendant:
Levy & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pickering v. Levy & Associates, LLC
as 1:2015oe00018
Plaintiff:
Donette Pickering
Defendant:
Levy & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
