Cases 1 - 10 of 589
Converse et al v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2024cv02686
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Mamie Converse and Clark Converse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Kelly v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2024cv12239
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Kelly
Defendant:
David Greenleaf and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Black v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 2:2024cv11767
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Jerry Baker, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Litwicki et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2024cv00225
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Mid-Century Insurance Company, Yemaja T Green and others
Plaintiff:
Tonya Litwicki and Jason Litwicki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00604
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shaw v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv02309
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Deshuna Shaw
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Memphis Police Internal Affairs Bureau, Tennessee Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Martin v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. US Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv10869
Plaintiff:
Mileathia Johnson
Defendant:
US Postal Service, Jeffrey Nail and Alfred Washington
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
