Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HARGROVE et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv12678
Plaintiff:
PR MONIQUE HARGROVE and GERALD HARGROVE, DECEASED
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Don Pray, Michael Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pray v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03066
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Pray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swint, et al v. Zanders Papeire, et al
as 1:2021cv01017
Defendant:
Operation Praying Mantis, Power Shift 21, World Health Organization, Alpha Piper Disaster Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint and Chrystal Marie Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hari et al v. Singh et al
as 5:2019cv00015
Plaintiff:
Shantilal Hari and Asokkumar Chudasama
Defendant:
Creative Eye International, LLC, 27 Haute Avenue Boutique, Rajiv Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor et al v. Johnson et al
as 5:2016cv10256
Plaintiff:
Robert Taylor , Douglas R. Alexander , Matthew Bierlein and others
Defendant:
Ruth Johnson and State of Michigan
Amicu:
Foundation for Michigan Freedom , Detroit, City of , Michigan Municipal League and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Helman v. Pray et al
as 2:2015cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jordan Helman
Defendant:
Anthony Pray, City of Columbus, Ohio and PNCJ, Inc., dba Peerless Culinary and Nightlife Management Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv12492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Jermano v. Taylor et al
as 2:2011cv10739
Plaintiff:
M Amelia (Neal) Jermano
Defendant:
Troy Taylor, Rachel Meyers, Eric Zarfl and others
Ross v. ITT Cleveland Motion Control et al
as 1:2009cv02220
Plaintiff:
Felicia L Ross
Defendant:
ITT Cleveland Motion Control, Cathy Rose, Ted Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
