Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Stanley v. Kalamazoo, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Stanley
Defendant:
City of Kalamazoo, Integrated Services of Kalamazoo, Bronson Methodist Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Pena v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. et al
as 2:2022cv11867
Plaintiff:
Celsa Pena
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Pena #625133 et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2020cv00250
Plaintiff:
Parnell Seaton #159030 and Jacinto Pena #625133
Defendant:
Unknown Party #2, Unknown Party #5, Connie Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crane et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 2:2019cv12485
Plaintiff:
Patsy Anderson, Glenda Colvin, Richard Dushion and others
Defendant:
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V., Robert Bosch LLC, VM Motori S.p.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bartel et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11357
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stiner, Otto Bartel, Amy Albright and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Pena v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2019cv10670
Plaintiff:
Krystal L Pena
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Pena
as 2:2017mj30506
Defendant:
Francisco Pena
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Pena
as 2:2017mj30506
Defendant:
Francisco Pena
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Garcia Santillan v. El Milagro of Michigan, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00826
Plaintiff:
Oscar Garcia Santillan
Defendant:
El Milagro of Michigan, Inc. and Henry Pena
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
