Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Bishop v. Rhoades et al
as 3:2023cv01106
Plaintiff:
Jason Lynn Bishop
Defendant:
Dusty Rhoades, Capt. f/n/u Youker, Sgt. f/n/u Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dodson v. Rhoades
as 3:2023cv00754
Petitioner:
Christopher James Dodson
Defendant:
Shawn Phillips
Respondent:
Sheriff Dusty Rhoades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Anderson et al v. ARC Automotive, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
David Anderson, Robert Ballero Gonzalez, Deneen Brown and others
Defendant:
ARC Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Burnett v. Rhoades et al
as 3:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Serrod Burnett
Defendant:
Dusty Rhoades, Tonja l/n/u, Kristin l/n/u and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimble v. Williamson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Sarah Kimble
Defendant:
Williamson County, Tennessee, Sheriff Robert "Dusty" Rhoades, Deputy Jonah Hollister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burnett v. Rhoades et al
as 3:2021cv00930
Plaintiff:
Serrod Burnett
Defendant:
Dusty Rhoades, Mathew l/n/u, Kristin l/n/u and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhoades v. Moore et al
as 1:2020cv01034
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Rhoades
Defendant:
Jim W Horner, Phillip Bivens, Todd Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhoades v. Bedford County et al
as 3:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Bedford County Jail and Bedford County
Plaintiff:
Cheyenne J. Rhoades
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofton v. Dobbins et al
as 3:2020cv00012
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lofton
Defendant:
Mike Dobbins, Chad Youker, Dan Vandenbosch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Dobbins et al
as 3:2019cv01160
Defendant:
Mike Dobbins, Chad Youker, Dan Vandenbosch and others
Plaintiff:
Brian E. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
