Cases 1 - 10 of 450
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02641
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rodgers v. Shelby County Criminal Court
as 2:2024cv02604
Respondent:
Shelby County Criminal Court
Petitioner:
Octavious D. Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nash v. Clear Vista Health and Wellness et al.
as 1:2024cv01134
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Quinn Kucia, Lindsay Kenyon and others
Plaintiff:
Rob Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5715
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rodgers v. Rodgers
as 3:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hardeman Rodgers
Defendant:
Christopher Lawrence Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Partee v. Stepherson, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02529
Defendant:
LaTanya Owens, James Dixon, Ray Torry and others
Plaintiff:
Laquinta Partee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Noggle et al v. EasyKnock, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv11638
Plaintiff:
Leonard Rodgers, Adam Noggle, Gunther Hamann and others
Defendant:
EK Real Estate Fund 1, LLC, EasyKnock, Inc. and Jarred Kessler
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Rodgers et al
as 2:2024cv02378
Plaintiff:
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Three Bridges Trading Fund, LLC and Donald Wray Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6 (b) Federal Commodity Exchange Regulation
Ryan v. State of et al
as 4:2024cv11105
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, MDOC, G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
