Cases 1 - 10 of 437
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Rutherford v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65459
Plaintiff:
Nick C Rutherford
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Zimmer v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Brevan Zimmer
Defendant:
Rutherford County and Dr. John Daniel Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. McCullough et al
as 3:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Camron O. James
Defendant:
Andrew McCullough and Rutherford Co. Adult Det. Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Harrell et al
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ellis
Defendant:
f/n/u Harrell, Rutherford County Jail and Rutherford County Shirfe Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5219
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
Marable v Ascension St. Thomas et al
as 3:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Carl G. Marable
Defendant:
Ascension St. Thomas of Rutherford, Murfreesboro Police Department, Rutherford County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5217
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
Jones v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Leo Lamont Jones
Defendant:
Rutherford County and James Elliot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
