Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
VanPuymbrouck v. Hunsberger et al
as 1:2022cv00680
Defendant:
James Hunsberger and Steven Starner
Claimant:
Darren VanPuymbrouck and Laura VanPuymbrouck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Real Property
Evans v. Iceman et al
as 2:2021cv05213
Plaintiff:
Antionette Evans and Antoinette Evans
Defendant:
Jennifer Iceman, Michael Starner, James Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kozusko et al v Tire Discounters, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00086
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Kozusko , David Johnson , Scott A. Mustovich and others
Defendant:
Tire Discounters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Starner v. Johnson et al
as 2:2016cv01203
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Starner
Defendant:
Neil Johnson, Benjamin MacDowell, James Pack and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Danny Starner v. Charlotte Jenkins
as 16-4091
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANNY E. STARNER
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLOTTE JENKINS, Warden
Danny Starner v. Shane Clark
as 16-3562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY E. STARNER
Defendant - Appellee:
SHANE CLARK, Administrator
Starner v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2015cv01841
Petitioner:
Danny E. Starner
Respondent:
Charlotte Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Starner v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2015cv02797
Petitioner:
Danny E. Starner
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
