Cases 1 - 10 of 29
KY, et al v. FHWA, et al
as 24-5532
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, SHAILEN BHATT, in his official capacity at Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and others
State of Tennessee et al v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Charlotte A. Burrows, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Tennessee v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 24-5220
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
State of Tennessee et al v. Cardona et al
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of Ohio and others
Defendant:
Miguel Cardona and United States Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Commonwealth of Kentucky et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of South Dakota, State of Alabama and others
Defendant:
Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt, U.S. Department of Transportation and others
Interested Party:
The American Road and Transportation Builders Association and The Associated General Contractors of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jane Doe 1, et al v. William Thornbury, Jr., et al
as 23-5609
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE 1, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN MINOR DOE 1, by and through his next friend, Jane Doe 1 and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. THORNBURY, JR., MD, in his official capacity as the President of the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, et al.
Intervenor:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY EX REL. ATTORNEY GENERAL DANIEL CAMERON
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF ALASKA and others
L. W., et al v. Jonathan Skrmetti, et al
as 23-5600
Plaintiff / Appellee:
L. W., by and through her parents and next friends, Samantha Williams and Brian Williams, SAMANTHA WILLIAMS, BRIAN WILLIAMS and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN THOMAS SKRMETTI, in his official capacity as the Tennessee Attorney General and Reporter, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, RALPH ALVARADO, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Health and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Doe 1 et al v. Thornbury et al
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Minor Doe 1 and others
Defendant:
William C. Thornbury, Jr., Audria Denker and Eric Friedlander
Intervenor Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky ex rel. Attorney General Daniel Cameron
Amicus Curiae:
American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Academic Pediatric Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Feather-Gorbey v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00995
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Kentucky, Governor and Attorney General, State of Virgina, Governor and Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Owl Feather-Gorbey et al
as 5:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Chief Col Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Tennessee, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
