Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Tyler SchaefferIn re: Tyler Schaeffer
as 23-5712
Petitioner:
In re: TYLER JAMES SCHAEFFER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust v. Pessina, et al.
as 1:2022cv01717
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust
Defendant:
Stefano Pessina, Jose E Almeida, Janice M Babiak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schaeffer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01730
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SCHAEFFER
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CUC Properties VI, LLC v. smartLink Ventures, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00659
Plaintiff:
CUC Properties VI, LLC
Defendant:
smartLink Ventures, Inc., John Schaeffer and Jonathan Salisbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
York v. Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Sarah York
Defendant:
Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Inc., Garren Colvin, Gary Blank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyler SchaefferIn re: Tyler Schaeffer
as 20-6286
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: TYLER JAMES SCHAEFFER
Kalayeh et al v. Allergan PLC et al
as 1:2020op45262
Defendant:
Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Arjomand Kalayeh and Carol Schaeffer Kalayeh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schaeffer v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 4:2020cv12620
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Rose Schaeffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Baker et al v. Cheatham County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00244
Defendant:
Shane Hanson, Cheatham County, Tennessee, Michael Breedlove and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Baker and Jariel Kling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler Schaeffer v. USA
as 20-5012
Petitioner / Appellant:
TYLER JAMES SCHAEFFER
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
