Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Tankesly v. TN Department of Corrections et al (PSLC1)
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Calvin-Otis Tankesly, Jr.
Defendant:
TN Department of Corrections, Lisa Helton, Lee Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Cobble et al
as 1:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parks, Jr.
Defendant:
Cobble, Johnson D Beard, Sgt Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Robinson et al
as 3:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
Lorenzoe Wilson
Defendant:
Brandon Robinson, Brian Gouldy, FNU Daugherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grover #439559 v. Lange et al
as 1:2021cv00252
Defendant:
CO Nalley, Sgt. Johnson, Sgt. Obrien and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Grover and Patrick Grover #439559
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Mrs. Siemes, Sgt. Johnson, Brett Cobble and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Braden v. Derrick Schofield, et al
as 17-5172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK RANARD BRADEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, Tennessee Department of Correction Commissioner, DOUG COOK, Warden, SGT. JOHNSON and others
Derrick Braden v. Derrick Schofield, et al
as 16-6817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK RANARD BRADEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, Tennessee Department of Correction Commissioner, DOUG COOK, Warden, SGT. JOHNSON and others
Derrick Braden v. Derrick Schofield, et al
as 16-6648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK RANARD BRADEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, Tennessee Department of Correction Commissioner, DOUG COOK, Warden, SGT. JOHNSON and others
Braden v. Tennessee Department of Corrections
as 2:2016cv02358
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ranard Braden
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Doug Cook, Sgt. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.