Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Penley v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Cody Penley
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Butch Gallion, Sharon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tubbs-Chandler v. Gallion et al
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Tubbs-Chandler
Defendant:
Butch Gallion, Autumn Armstrong, Sharon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Lawson et al
as 2:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Martin E. Hughes
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Butch Gallion, Autumn Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Patel et al
as 2:2018cv02020
Plaintiff:
Sharon Smith
Defendant:
Bhikha Patel and Shree Jala LLC of Memphis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Estes v. Hawkins County Justice Center et al
as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Donald Eric Estes
Defendant:
Hawkins County Justice Center, Southern Health Partners, Dr. Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pilkins v. Hawkins County Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lynn Pilkins
Defendant:
Butch Gallion, Sharon Smith, Hunter Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houle v. Hawkins County Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00155
Defendant:
Hawkins County Jail, Hawkins County Sheriff Office, Hawkins County Court System and others
Plaintiff:
Dakota James Houle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AppleBerry v. Lawson et al
as 2:2014cv00124
Plaintiff:
Jarvis DeWayne AppleBerry, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Butch Gallion, Sharon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinen et al v. Hawkins County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2013cv00296
Plaintiff:
Richard Hinen , AGH , RJH and others
Defendant:
Hawkins County, Tennessee, Ronnie Lawson, William Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pillow v. Schofield et al
as 1:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
Timothy C. Pillow
Defendant:
Derrick D. Schofield, Jerry Lester, Rose Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
