Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Shockley v. Sweet et al
as 4:2024cv11462
Plaintiff:
Clifton D. Shockley
Defendant:
Sweet, Clemmons, Schirmer and others
United States of America v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 2.65 Acres of Land, More or Less, In Sumner County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way over 2.65 Acres of Land, More or Less, In Sumner County, Tennessee and Shockley Land Partners
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Shockley v. Summit County Jail Medical Staff
as 5:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
Jason R Shockley
Defendant:
Summit County Jail Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Air Devil's Inn Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00601
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Air Devil's Inn Inc. doing business as Air Devil's Inn, Russell Shockley and Kristie Shockley
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Shockley v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv04445
Plaintiff:
Douglas Shockley
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Paul Shockley
as 20-4094
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL L. SHOCKLEY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Paul Shockley
as 20-3923
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL L. SHOCKLEY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shockley v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45527
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Anda, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kayla Shockley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
