Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Nisbett v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02162
Plaintiff:
Ryan Merven Nisbett
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioner, 201 Shelby County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Lewis et al
as 4:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Bryan Mikel Williams, Kenneth Morris, Tyrese Deomineke Mosby and others
Defendant:
Mike Lewis, Ulrich and Sgt Victoria Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosby et al v. Lewis et al
as 4:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Deomineke Mosby, Bryan Williams, Kenneth Morris and others
Defendant:
Mike Lewis, Dan Ulrich, Deputy Jailer Victoria Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris et al v. Lewis et al
as 4:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kenneth DeShawn Morris, Bryan Mikel Williams, Preston Andrew Dickerson and others
Defendant:
Mike Lewis and Ulrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Suttle v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00832
Plaintiff:
Cedric Suttle
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Suttles et al v. Ohio Automobile Club et al
as 2:2021cv05018
Plaintiff:
Brenda Suttles and Robert Suttles
Defendant:
Ohio Automobile Club and Ohio Automobile Club Health Care Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
USA v. Lorenzo Suttles
as 21-5499
Defendant / Appellant:
LORENZO SUTTLES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Burchfield v. Brooks et al
as 3:2021cv00040
Defendant:
Sgt Stergil, Lt. Berry, Lt. Josh and others
Plaintiff:
Sam Burchfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suttles v. USA
as 1:2020cv00301
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jermaine Suttles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Suttles v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00251
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Melissa Suttles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
