Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cain v. Page et al
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Cain and Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Sargent Noah Page, Jailer Ken Claud, Thomas Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. McCustion et al
as 5:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Cain and Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Lt Slade McCustion, Jailer Ken Claud, Major Thomas Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Marshall et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Captin Thomas Marshall, Jailer Ken Claud, Comprehensive Correctional Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Comprehensive Correctional Care et al
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Comprehensive Correctional Care, Nurse Provider Leesia Smith, Ken Claud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Cross et al
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Ofc Cross, Calloway County, WKCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerbyson v. Claude et al
as 5:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Jason Marshall Kerbyson
Defendant:
Jailer Ken Claude, Cpt Thomas Marshall, Lt Slade McCuiston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tidwell v. Calloway County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
David Tidwell
Defendant:
Deputy Jailer Sindy Bayles, Supervisor Slade McCuiston, Chief Deputy Dee Ann Benke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. City of Breckinridge et al
as 4:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Thomas Marshall Robinson
Defendant:
City of Breckinridge, Breckinridge County Detention Center, Allen Shreewsbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prade v. City of Akron, et al
as 5:2014cv00188
Plaintiff:
Douglas Prade
Defendant:
City of Akron, Mary Myers, Ed Duvall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
