Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Whitaker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00560
Petitioner:
Toby Whitaker
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ausbun v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01346
Plaintiff:
Toby Ausbun
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dagy v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 5:2023cv02120
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Tobi Dagy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Munger v. Matco Tools Corporation
as 5:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Andrew Munger, Toby Clarkson Gardner, Keston Lewis and others
Defendant:
Matco Tools Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
C and C Wine and Spirits Inc v. Gammill
as 1:2023cv02512
Not Classified By Court:
Gail Mooney
Plaintiff:
C and C Wine and Spirits Inc
Defendant:
Toby J. Gammill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
C and C Wine and Spirits Inc v. Gammill
as 2:2023cv02512
Plaintiff:
C and C Wine and Spirits Inc
Defendant:
Toby J. Gammill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hall v. Scioto County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
Toby Hall
Defendant:
Scioto County Jail and John Aeh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivers v. Parker et al
as 6:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Keith Rivers
Defendant:
Larry Parker, Daniel Kanyam, Joy Levine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gardner et al v. Matco Tools Corporation
as 5:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Toby Clarkson Gardner and Keston Lewis
Defendant:
Matco Tools Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stone v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Jackie Wayne Stone and Jackie W. Stone
Defendant:
Barry T. Smith, Taylor County Detention Center, Hack Marcum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
