Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Lariviere v. Beardslee Investments, Inc.
as 2:2022cv13160
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY P. LARIVIERE
Defendant:
BEARDSLEE INVESTMENTS, INC., W.C. BEARDSLEE, INC. and Beardslee Investments, Inc. Doing business as W.C. Beardslee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Braden v. Reburn, et al
as 2:2017cv02424
Plaintiff:
Gordon Braden
Defendant:
W.C. Reburn, III, FNU McKinney and FNU Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Wilson et al
as 1:2017cv01067
Plaintiff:
Prentiss Phillips
Defendant:
Scott Wilson, Sue Ann Brewer, Juanita Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe v. Beverly Briley, et al
as 16-6823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN N. DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
BEVERLY BRILEY, HUGH MOTT, SAM L. FELTS, JR. and others
Hammonds v. W.C. Jail Medical Staff et al
as 3:2015cv01141
Plaintiff:
Eric T. Hammonds
Defendant:
W.C. Jail Medical Staff and The Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparks v. Schofield et al
as 2:2015cv02287
Plaintiff:
Clint A. Sparks
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, James M. Holloway, Tim Wauthorp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Doe v. Beverly Briley, et al
as 14-6159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN N. DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
BEVERLY BRILEY, HUGH MOTT, SAM L. FELTS, JR. and others
Smith v. Hochul et al
as 4:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
Brian Avery Smith
Defendant:
William J. Hochul, Jr., Maura K. O'Donnell, Richard Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
P.C., et al v. Milford Exempted Village Schoo
as 13-3169
Plaintiff - Appellee:
P.C., Parents of R.C., Individually and on behalf of R.C. and W.C., Parents of R.C., Individually and on behalf of R.C.
Defendant - Appellant:
MILFORD EXEMPTED VILLAGE SCHOOLS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
